End-to-end IoT engineering
oscarcabreragonzalez IoT Studio What isn't measured slips away
SECTOR 2 23,4 °C
Blog · IoT cases › Smart city
The Netherlands Smart Water 6 min

The Hague waters its planters with data: 1.2 million litres saved

Soil moisture sensors decide where and when to water, and watering rounds go from eight to six days.

Watering "by the calendar" means watering a planter in the shade the same as one in full sun, whether it is hot or raining. The Hague swapped the calendar for data: soil moisture sensors, connected via LoRaWAN to the ConnectedGreen platform, indicate which planter needs water and which does not.
≈ 1,2 M L
of water saved in four months
8 → 6
working days per watering round
≈ 160
sensors for 1,800 planters
−25 %
on some maintenance routes

What is measured and how it is decided

Some 160 sensors track the condition of the city's 1,800 planters. There is no need for one sensor per planter: they are grouped by plant type, exposure and substrate, and one representative sensor covers its group. The platform calculates the amount of water for each and generates the day's route.

The architecture is that of a classic IoT ecosystem: sensor → LoRaWAN → platform → analysis → application → action in the field.

25%
Reduction in days per watering round: from 8 to 6 working days ((8 − 6) ÷ 8 = 25 %).

The results

According to the Dutch trade press, the city saved some 1.2 million litres of water in four months. A watering round that used to take eight working days now takes six, and some of the maintenance companies' routes were shortened by 25 %, with less fuel and fewer hours.

From the soil to the watering route
Moisture sensor
→
LoRaWAN
→
ConnectedGreen
→
Today's watering route

The calculation: what those figures mean per planter

1,200,000 L ÷ 1,800 planters ≈ 667 L per planter in four months, about 5.5 L per planter per day (667 ÷ 120). That is the water that used to be given in excess, or at the wrong time.

And the round going from 8 to 6 days is a reduction of (8 − 6) ÷ 8 = 25 %, consistent with the published route shortening. Fewer route days mean fewer lorries on the street: the water saving comes with savings in diesel and staff hours.

Water saved, broken down
Total in 4 months≈ 1.2 M L
Per planter in 4 months≈ 667 L
Per planter per day≈ 5.5 L
Source of the total: Boomzorg. Breakdown: our own calculation over 1,800 planters and 120 days.

Lessons for your company

  • You don't need one sensor per plant: well-designed sampling represents the whole group.
  • Water savings bring other savings with them: routes, fuel and working hours.
  • The same architecture works for agriculture, industrial parks and green infrastructure.

Sources and references

Stad+Groen 3/2023 · Watergeven met sensoren ↗ Boomzorg · ConnectedGreen ↗ Óscar C. González · original post on LinkedIn ↗

The economic data and results cited come from the linked sources (cases published by the companies themselves, technology integrators or academic institutions). oscarcabreragonzalez IoT Studio compiles this information for informational purposes; it does not imply any commercial relationship with the companies mentioned.

Did you find this case useful?

Comments (0)

You need an account to comment. It's free and quick. Log in or sign up
Be the first to comment on this case.

Would you like an ecosystem like this for your organisation?

At oscarcabreragonzalez IoT Studio we design and implement end-to-end IoT solutions, from the sensor to the dashboard.

Let's talk about your project